Proposed standard RESNET/ICC 380-2028 amends the 2025 edition of Standard 380 to provide clarifications identified via formal interpretation requests, to ensure consistency with Standard 301, and to ensure editorial consistency. This first public review draft, PDS-01 of RESNET/ICC 380-2028, is submitted for public comment for 45 days, beginning August 7, 2026, and ending September 21, 2026. Only the changes shown in the by strike-through and underline text in red print are open for comment. To review the draft addendum, click on “VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM HERE” below. To submit your comments, click on “SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE” below. Comments are posted online, and you will be able to review comments by clicking on “VIEW COMMENTS HERE” below. When submitting a comment, you must close the page out and re-open it to view your comment. Refreshing the page will cause the comment to be submitted a second time. When posting a comment, please refrain from using your device’s autofill feature, as this may prevent your comment from being submitted. VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM HERE VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM FOR Draft PDS-01, RESNET/ICC 380-2028 Update (Opens August 7, 2026) To review the draft addendum, click on Draft PDS-01, RESNET/ICC 380-2028 Update Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE Submit your comment below for Draft PDS-01, RESNET/ICC 380-2028 Update COMMENTER First Name: * Last Name: * Affiliation * (who you represent) LOCATION Country : * United States of AmericaCanada Address: * City: * State/Province: * AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming Zip Code: * CONTACT INFORMATION Phone Number: * Email Address: * COMMENT Page Number: * Section/Table/Figure Number: Comment Intent: * Select a Comment IntentObjectionNot an Objection Comment Type: * Select a Comment TypeGeneralTechnicalEditorial Click the "DOWNLOAD FORM" link below to complete your comment and proposed change, then upload the completed form below. Use "strikethrough" and "underline" formatting to indicate all proposed changes. Changes must be shown with "hard-formatting" strikethrough and underline, not "track changes." DOWNLOAD FORM Upload Comment and Proposed Change Form * Drop a file here or click to upload Choose File Maximum file size: 268.44MB Submit Start Over If you are human, leave this field blank. VIEW COMMENTS HERE Entry Date: August 7, 2026 at 1:01 PM Full Name: Brian Christensen Affiliation: Residential Energy Management Services Address: 7605 Bergamo Ave Sarasota, Florida 34238 Phone Number: 9412034750 Email: brian@remsvc.com Page Number: 13 of 38, 18 of 38 Section/Table/Figure Number: 403.2.4 footnote 36; also Equation 4-14 Comment Intent: Technical Comment Type: Comment and Proposed Change: Download Tips and Reminders for Submitting Public Comments Comments must pertain to the changes shown in the draft as either strike-through or underlined text in red print. Comments not on the changes under consideration will be rejected. Comments should include a specific proposed change to the text of the draft open for comment and an explanation sufficient for the review committees to understand the commenter’s concern or objection. Proposed added text must be underlined and text proposed to be removed must be shown using strike-through. If not submitted in this format, the public comment may be rejected. Do not submit comments on other chapters or on sections or proposed changes that are not identified as open for public comment by red print. Comments not on the proposal under consideration will be rejected. If you submit public comment representing the collective interests of a group of stakeholders, you are encouraged to submit ONE public comment and identify all stakeholders in that comment. While not required, this expedites the ability of the committees to respond to commenters in a timely manner. Public comments are reviewed by committees comprised of volunteer members, that are Raters, Providers, Software Developers and other industry and public interest stakeholders. They are not reviewed by RESNET Staff. Most amendments to RESNET standards are proposed by industry and public stakeholders not RESNET. To learn more about submitting proposed amendments visit this page: https://www.resnet.us/about/standards/submit-proposed-amendments/