Draft PDS-02, RESNET/ICC 1450-202x Remote Virtual Inspections (Opens May 9, 2025)

Proposed standard RESNET/ICC 1450-202x provides criteria for implementing Remote Virtual Inspections (RVI) in the evaluation of energy code compliance and in the evaluation and rating of the water-use and energy efficiency performance of buildings. The standardized RVI criteria will be used by code officials and their designee(s) and by home performance inspectors and raters when evaluating all aspects of construction for building energy and water conservation programs, laws and regulations. The first draft of the standard was submitted for public review and comment and this second draft has been modified in response to accepted proposed changes to draft PDS-01. The changes to the first draft are open for comment.

Draft PDS-02, RESNET/ICC 1450-202x is submitted for public comment for 30 days, beginning May 9, 2025, and ending June 8, 2025. Only the changes shown in draft PDS-02 by strike-through and underline and red print are open for comment.

To review the draft addendum, click on “VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM HERE” below.

To submit your comments, click on “SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE” below.

Comments are posted online and you will be able to review comments by clicking on “VIEW COMMENTS HERE” below.

When submitting a comment, you must close the page out and re-open it to view your comment. Refreshing the page will cause the comment to be submitted a second time.

When posting a comment, please refrain from using your device’s autofill feature as this may prevent your comment from being submitted.

To view the draft addendum, please check back on May 9, 2025.

The public comment period is closed.

No Entries Found

Tips and Reminders for Submitting Public Comments 

  • Comments must pertain to the changes shown in the draft as either strike-through or underlined text in red print. Comments not on the changes under consideration will be rejected.
  • Comments should include a specific proposed change to the text of the draft open for comment and an explanation sufficient for the review committees to understand the commenter’s concern or objection. Proposed added text must be underlined and text proposed to be removed must be shown using strike-through. If not submitted in this format, the public comment may be rejected.
  • Do not submit comments on other chapters or on sections or proposed changes that are not identified as open for public comment by red print. Comments not on the proposal under consideration will be rejected.
  • If you submit public comment representing the collective interests of a group of stakeholders, you are encouraged to submit ONE public comment and identify all stakeholders in that comment. While not required, this expedites the ability of the committees to respond to commenters in a timely manner.
  • Public comments are reviewed by committees comprised of volunteer members, that are Raters, Providers, Software Developers and other industry and public interest stakeholders. They are not reviewed by RESNET Staff.
  • Most amendments to RESNET standards are proposed by industry and public stakeholders not RESNET. To learn more about submitting proposed amendments visit this page: https://www.resnet.us/about/standards/submit-proposed-amendments/