Proposed Addendum 108f is the required follow-on permanent version of interim Addendum 108i – Corrective Actions for Failed File or Field QA Review. The interim addendum that’s currently in effect is intended to provide flexibility during the transition to mandatory use of the QA App. Flexibility is essential at this time to avoid over-applying formal disciplinary actions where corrective coaching, enhanced oversight, and additional QA review remain the more appropriate response. Comments will be accepted on underlined and strike through text in red print within draft PDS-01. To review and comment on the Draft follow the links below. The public comment period begins July 22, 2026, and ends August 21, 2026. To review the draft addendum, click on “VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM HERE” below. To submit your comments, click on “SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE” below. Comments are posted online and you will be able to review comments by clicking on “VIEW COMMENTS HERE” below. When submitting a comment, you must close the page out and re-open it to view your comment. Refreshing the page will cause the comment to be submitted a second time. When posting a comment, please refrain from using your device’s autofill feature as this may prevent your comment from being submitted. VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM HERE VIEW DRAFT ADDENDUM FOR Draft PDS-01, HERS Addendum 108f, Corrective Actions for Failed File or Field QA Review To review the draft addendum, click on Draft PDS-01, HERS Addendum 108f, Corrective Actions for Failed File or Field QA Review Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE Submit your comment below for Draft PDS-01, HERS Addendum 108f, Corrective Actions for Failed File or Field QA Review COMMENTER First Name: * Last Name: * Affiliation * (who you represent) LOCATION Country : * United States of AmericaCanada Address: * City: * State/Province: * AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming Zip Code: * CONTACT INFORMATION Phone Number: * Email Address: * COMMENT Page Number: * Section/Table/Figure Number: Comment Intent: * Select a Comment IntentObjectionNot an Objection Comment Type: * Select a Comment TypeGeneralTechnicalEditorial Click the "DOWNLOAD FORM" link below to complete your comment and proposed change, then upload the completed form below. Use "strikethrough" and "underline" formatting to indicate all proposed changes. Changes must be shown with "hard-formatting" strikethrough and underline, not "track changes." DOWNLOAD FORM Upload Comment and Proposed Change Form * Drop a file here or click to upload Choose File Maximum file size: 268.44MB Submit Start Over If you are human, leave this field blank. VIEW COMMENTS HERE Entry Date: July 22, 2026 at 12:47 PM Full Name: Jacob Hooper Affiliation: ICS Inspectors Address: 4052 Mt Brynion Rd Kelso, Washington 98626 Phone Number: 3607131896 Email: jacobh@ics-inspectors.com Page Number: 1 Section/Table/Figure Number: Comment Intent: Not an Objection Comment Type: General Comment and Proposed Change: DownloadEntry Date: August 6, 2026 at 7:37 PM Full Name: Joshua Anderson Affiliation: Myself Address: 172 Neal Rd West Liberty, Kentucky 41472 Phone Number: 386-944-8667 Email: joshua.andersonqad@gmail.com Page Number: 1 Section/Table/Figure Number: 905.6.4.5. Comment Intent: Objection Comment Type: Editorial Comment and Proposed Change: Download Tips and Reminders for Submitting Public Comments Comments must pertain to the changes shown in the draft as either strike-through or underlined text in red print. Comments not on the changes under consideration will be rejected. Comments should include a specific proposed change to the text of the draft open for comment and an explanation sufficient for the review committees to understand the commenter’s concern or objection. Proposed added text must be underlined and text proposed to be removed must be shown using strike-through. If not submitted in this format, the public comment may be rejected. Do not submit comments on other chapters or on sections or proposed changes that are not identified as open for public comment by red print. Comments not on the proposal under consideration will be rejected. If you submit public comment representing the collective interests of a group of stakeholders, you are encouraged to submit ONE public comment and identify all stakeholders in that comment. While not required, this expedites the ability of the committees to respond to commenters in a timely manner. Public comments are reviewed by committees comprised of volunteer members, that are Raters, Providers, Software Developers and other industry and public interest stakeholders. They are not reviewed by RESNET Staff. Most amendments to RESNET standards are proposed by industry and public stakeholders not RESNET. To learn more about submitting proposed amendments visit this page: https://www.resnet.us/about/standards/submit-proposed-amendments/
